S94 Grooming!

Recording link:

https://ubc.zoom.us/rec/share/HCcSpWuBtskLc5VPyf9XCyNjDoricsWhF0zI_jjLkGG2dizeQ4b4bGbgRWrYhI0.btL10NrWexWE2VqD
Passcode: ?@HMnz9Z

Agenda

• Soil V2

  • Soil sampling task

    • needed to fill gap between soil amendment task

  • Product table

    • setting aside for now

Discussion points

• Soil sample location points

  • Details

    • name (auto name eg sample #8)

      • editable?:

        • not yet, only available on task

        • not useful since soil samples are mixed together

    • location (Lat Lng)

      • editability

        • remove

        • is edit possible?

      • number

        • (count) soft-linked to next part of screen

        • what happens if you remove count when you go back to the pin screen?

        • maybe a warning?

        • why not hard link?

          • very similar to how when you create an area on map but user can edit the total area afterwards

        • swap the form screens? Why location needs to be first?

          • will explore but:

          • doesn't match litefarm task pattern

        • where can a point be added?

          • in one location to be linked to the field

          • on multiple locations

          • select multiple areas

          • outside of areas

          • is soil analysis accurate for area if selected outside area?

          • Got to let the farmer use some common sense if linking to an area they shouldn't locate outside it unless they know what they are doing - restricting it would be condescending

        • allow user to input coordinates?

          • no: coordinates are approximate

          • other apps do it better

          • it would be a lot of work to do it better

• Multiple depths per soil analysis?

  • No: its an important fact they should all be at the same depth

• Complete flow

  • Should you be able to create a follow up analysis task?

    • should we force create it – it seems valuable?

      • maybe not: For example a test - you might practice a test and not complete it

  • The person who creates the sample task would be better to understand when the results might come back?

    • not the worker in complete flow?

TO DO