LF-3308 Test Plan

https://lite-farm.atlassian.net/browse/LF-3308

Currently during the creation of the crop plan , the user is not able to assign all tasks to the one user , that is why there is a need to assign every task individually

 

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Requirement specific constraints

  • Testing per Jira ticket

  • Testing Cascading effects

  • Ensure that the user is able to assign all tasks to the one user using API tool ( Postman )

  • Ensure that in the database all the information is stored correctly

 

Role based constraints

  • Ensure that FO / FM / EO is able to assign all tasks in the crop plan creation

  • Ensure that the FW is still not able to create a crop plan

N/A

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

  • Ensure that user or farm preferences doesn’t play role during the creation flow

N/A

N/A

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Numerical input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

N/A

N/A

N/A

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

  • Per UI user must see the Assignee field (between “Crop plan name” and “Crop plan notes”)

  • Label and input field: “Assignee”

  • Pre-populate field with “Unassigned” if more then one user exists.

  • If only one user exists at the farm, pre-populate this field with that user

  • Info text: “All tasks generated as part of this crop plan will be assigned to this individual. You can modify this assignment later” 

  • As the user types into “Assignee”, do a character-by-character match against users first and last names (farm workers get no results other than themselves)

    • User can click matching selection

  • Ensure that the user can Click “Save” to save the state to the store

N/A

N/A

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

  • Ensure that when the user clicks on the cancel button , the pop up confirmation message is displayed

  • Ensure that when the user clicks on the save button he is redirected to the created crop plan and the tasks are assigned to the user which was selected previously

N/A

N/A

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

  • Ensure that the notification is displayed after the user creates the crop plan and assignes created task to anyone.

N/A

N/A

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

  • Ensure that the user can still re - assign the created crop plan tasks to anybody else in the farm

  • Ensure that the user can still complete the created task without making any changes in the task

  • Ensure that the user can still complete the created task with making any changes in the task

  • Ensure that the user can still abandon the created task in the crop plan

  • Ensure that the user can still delete the created task in the crop plan (Except Planting Task)

N/A

N/A

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?

Concurrency

N/A

N/A

N/A

How do changes made to records affect other users on the farm? e.g. What happens when a record is soft deleted while another user is viewing said record?