S64 Retrospective

Date	Jul 5, 2023
In sprint	@David Trapp @Mwayanjana Bolokonya (Unlicensed) @Javier Antonio Hernandez De Paz @Carolina di Lello (Unlicensed) @Duncan Brain @Sayaka Ono @Joyce Sato-Reinhold @Denis Dovganyuk @jeremy.bennett8 (Unlicensed) @Cedric Levasseur-Laberge (Unlicensed) @Gursimran Singh @Iván Perdomo @Lite Farm @Shang Heng Mak
At retro	@David Trapp @Mwayanjana Bolokonya (Unlicensed) @Carolina di Lello (Unlicensed) @Duncan Brain @Sayaka Ono @Joyce Sato-Reinhold @Denis Dovganyuk @Gursimran Singh @Iván Perdomo @Lite Farm
Recording	Posted in Slack

Background

This retro is for the S64, roughly: Thursday, June 22nd - Wednesday, July 5th

Please add comments before the meeting! We’ll take a few minutes to add additional comments and discuss, then put together action items to operationalize suggestions.

Last sprints (S63) retro is here: https://lite-farm.atlassian.net/l/cp/W40t1L3K

Retrospective

Discussion topics:

Your topics here…
- Jira ticket format review
  - Technical document review
  - Functional Requirements / Design process review
  - Ticket format / “How to make good tickets”
    - Templates for different ticket types
- Attending Design sessions - I may have changed my mind devs could participate more - @Duncan Brain
  - With repeat crop plan there have been a lot of iterations - might have been better to get engineer input earlier.
  - Without dedicated attention to a story / epic it’s hard to flag feasibility issues earlier. Need to have an “implementer” mindset when looking at screens / requirements.
  - Storybook may make a back and forth between design and engineering easier. This is fine, but time is a constraint

Start doing	Stop doing	Keep doing	Shout outs

Start doing	Stop doing	Keep doing	Shout outs
Proposal: One single person leads a feature to completion (not only tech lead) Proposal: Document functional and technical requirements, leave issues for tracking the progress Use Confluence for overarching documents and then track individual tasks on Jira. There is a lead on functional requirements and then a technical lead to create technical documentation. Example Functional requirements also need to connect the team with the domain knowledge - the experience of the users. As you’re thinking about a problem or implementation, take the time to write it out - it helps you think through the issue. Everyone can do this, not just a “lead”.		Reviewing the action items from the previous sprint retro reviewing tickets in the daily Tech Daily agenda document Owning implementation and specific areas of the codebase (getting support from tech lead but not assuming they will own it)	Everyone is awesome!

Action items:

Review previous retro’s action items

@Duncan Brain to update document communication and make sure that Github auto-assignments are described and that they take place for folks outside the core team

@Lite Farm put together a session for reviewing current requirements → engineering process. Include discussion of overall process including how and when to incorporate engineers and feasibility into the design process.

Litefarm

S64 Retrospective

Analytics

Background

Retrospective

Discussion topics:

Action items:

Related content