LF-3283 Test Plan

Owned by Denis Dovganyuk
Last updated: May 30, 2023
3 min read

https://lite-farm.atlassian.net/browse/LF-3283

Currently the sensor algorithm is following: At every hour, find the most recent data point from the prior 59 minutes and store that to make the data visualization.If there is no data in the prior 59 minutes, do not include a data point.

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Requirement specific constraints

  • Testing as per Jira ticket

  • Testing cascading effects

N/A

  • Ensure that in the database the records stored appropriately

 

Role based constraints

  • Ensure that the new algorithm sensor readings are visible in the same way to all the farm roles: FW , FO , FM , EO

N/A

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Numerical input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

  • Ensure that timezone doesn’t play a role in the how the data display.

N/A

  • Ensure that the data converted correctly in the database

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

  • Ensure that the values appropriately updated once the units change from Metric to Imperial

N/A

  • Ensure that in the database values are stored correctly.

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

  • Ensure that the user can still retire the sensor

  • Ensure that the user can edit the sensor

N/A

  • Ensure once the changes were made it will accordingly stored in the database.

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?

Concurrency

N/A

N/A

N/A

How do changes made to records affect other users on the farm? e.g. What happens when a record is soft deleted while another user is viewing said record?