LF-3238 Test Plan

https://lite-farm.atlassian.net/browse/LF-3238

Currently the field common_name is not pre filled durong the new varietal creation flow.

 

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Requirement specific constraints

  • Testing as per Jira Ticket

  • Testing cascading effects

N/A

  • Ensure that in the database field common_name is correctly filled.

  • Ensure that all the fields are still correctly stored after this changes.

 

Role based constraints

  • Ensure that FO , FM , EO are able to create new varietal

  • Ensure that FW is not able to create new varietal

N/A

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

  • Ensure that the field common field would be auto populated both for the farm that is searching for certification , and for the farm that is not searching for certification

N/A

N/A

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Numerical input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

N/A

N/A

N/A

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

  • Ensure that if the user goes back and then forth the common _ name field is still auto populated .

N/A

N/A

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

  • Ensure that the user can still create the new varital by adding a new crop .

  • Ensure that the user can still create the new varital from an existing crop

N/A

  • Ensure that in the database all information is stored correctly after the creation

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?

Concurrency

N/A

N/A

N/A

How do changes made to records affect other users on the farm? e.g. What happens when a record is soft deleted while another user is viewing said record?