Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

Implement new Google SSO requirements when accepting an invite to a farm LF-2967 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Area / scope to test

Front end

Back end

Model

Notes

Requirement specific constraints

All UI elements visible as per LF-605 - Getting issue details... STATUS

N/A

N/A

Role based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

Copy correct for user invitation language

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Localization constraints

Copy displayed correctly for browser localization

N/A

N/A

Should data be displayed differently based on localization, e.g. date format, phone numbers, numbers in currency inputs. Doesn’t include language (which is covered in the section above).

Farm-level defaults / preferences

Numerical input constraints

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

  • Invitees are still able to signin to LiteFarm with Google SSO.

  • User profile for invitee is correct.

  • New users are able to sign out and sign back in with SSO

User status is updated to active after signing in with SSO

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

  • Proceed button is disabled until a choice is made

  • If Create a LiteFarm account is selected navigate to the create your account view

  • If SSO is selected proceed to your information view

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constrains

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?

  • No labels