LF-3557 Test Plan

Requirement specific constraints

• Testing as per Jira ticket

• Ensure that the user is able to create a custom expense type using the Front End.

• Testing the cascading effects

• Ensure that the user is able to create the custom expense type using the API tool(Postman)

• Ensure that in the database all the information is stored correctly

Role based constraints

• Ensure that the FW is not able to enter this page navigating through the web app.

• Ensure that the FW is not able to enter this view just by Pasting the link

• Ensure that FO / FM / EO are able to create the custom expense type

• Ensure that the user is not able to create a custom expense type as a farm worker using the API tool

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

• Ensure that the page is displayed on the user prefered language or the “Missing” tag exist.

• Ensure that the certification status of the farm doesn’t play role and all the info is displayed correctly.

N/A

N/A

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Numerical input constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

• Ensure that the user is able to enter any data he would like in the “Custom Expense type name” including numbers or special characters or non latin alphabit

N/A

N/A

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

N/A

N/A

N/A

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

• Ensure that once the user clicks on the “Save” button he will be redirected back to the “Manage custom expense type” page

N/A

N/A

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

• Ensure that once the user clicks on the “<“ button he is redirected back to the previous page

N/A

N/A

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

N/A

N/A

N/A

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

• Ensure that the same name of the custom expense can be used accross the farms

N/A

N/A

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

N/A

N/A

N/A

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

• Ensure that the user can retire the custom expense type

• Ensure that the user can’t create a duplicate of the custom expense type

• Ensure that the user can edit the custom expense type

N/A

N/A

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

N/A

N/A

N/A

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?

Concurrency

N/A

N/A

N/A

How do changes made to records affect other users on the farm? e.g. What happens when a record is soft deleted while another user is viewing said record?