Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Status

☑ Draft   ☐ Proposed    ☐ Accepted    ☐ Rejected    ☐ Superseded

Context

Jimmy Rowland has suggested that LiteFarm should use a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to improve the network load times of LiteFarm’s front-end application.

Alternatives

  1. Cloudflare

  2. KeyCDN

  3. …?

Forces at play for this decision include:

  1. The need to improve LiteFarm load times, especially for users geographically distant from the New York city location of the servers. This entails a need to effectively speed up the React/Redux front end built with vite.

  2. A desire to minimize impact on existing infrastructure, and for easy integration with existing Digital Ocean droplets.

  3. The need to reduce costs as much as reasonably possible.

Decision

We select … because …


We accept that …

  • No labels