LF-3019 Test Plan

LF-3019 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Area / scope to test	Front end	Back end	Model	Notes
Requirement specific constraints	Testing as per Jira ticket Testing cascading effects	Create an API request to test if the user is able to delete a crop plan where all the tasks are planned or completed Create an API request to test if the user can firstly DELETE a crop plan and then Complete the same crop plan ( PATCH request ) Create an API request to ensure the user is not able to PATCH the Assignee or Date once the Crop plan was already deleted	In the Database ensure that all the information is displayed correctly, once the user deletes the crop plan
Role based constraints	Only the following roles see the “Delete crop plan” link: FO / FM / EO Ensure that the user is not able to open the deletion link if he uses the account of FW	Ensure that VIA API tool the user is not able to delete the crop plan if the user _ id is the FW account	N/A	Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?
User preferences constraints	Ensure that the certification status doesn’t play role , try to delete the crop plan using the farm that is searching for certification and with the farm that is not searching for certification. Ensure that the information is displayed in the user prefered language or the “Missing” Tag should exist.	N/A	N/A	Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?
Numerical input constraints	N/A	N/A	N/A	Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?
Text input constraints				Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?
Date based constraints				Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.
Date based assumptions				Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?
Timezone driven interactions				If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?
Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints				Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da
Flow based constraints				Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?
Synchronous / asynchronous constraints				Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?
Time-out / low bandwidth constraints				Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?
Data transformation correctness				Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?
Outcome correctness				When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?
Switching farms				Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?
Notification constraints				Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?
Cascading effects				Are there logical places
Integration constrains				Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?
Concurrency				How do changes made to records affect other users on the farm? e.g. What happens when a record is soft deleted while another user is viewing said record?