Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Question

Answer

Notes

Which of our users will benefit most greatly from generating GHG estimations for their farms?

This can be an input into which tools we support / integrate with.

Should we be charging for the ability to generate GHG emissions if a farmer will realize a monetary benefit from doing so?

We would probably need to provide a seamless service where the user just agreed to pushing the data and we would handle the remainder of the transaction and take a cut.

Alternatively, we could just inform farmers of programs in the regions that would pay them for their reports. In this case we could build a “Tip LiteFarm” link for them to share the wealth.

Which of these tools should we use to estimate on farm GHG emission estimates?

Each has a geographic footprint:

  • HOLOS → Canada

  • COMET → Mostly USA

  • CFT → Mostly Europe

So the answer may be more than one.

Does it make more sense to build and maintain a Switchboard connector to integrate with COMET farm tool and Cool Farm Tool or to create direct integrations?

...