...
Follow-up questions
Question | Answer | Date |
---|---|---|
What migrations - caused by changing existing expense types - need to take place? | ||
Does it make sense for custom expense types to be at the end? Should they be elsewhere? | ||
How do we make types both short and crisp and descriptive? | Make the short descriptions searchable such that if someone searches for “lease” it brings up “Land” and “Machinery” since both of those might have the idea of a lease embedded within them. | |
Is alphabetical sorting the best ordering for expense types? | TBD; we would need a very good reason to move away. If we do move away, it needs to be statically ordered. | |
With 12 default categories, it feels like we’re right on the edge of tiles being a useful tool. Do we need to rethink the selection process / flow? | Remove or reduce icons role and move to list view rather than tile view. Loic Sans thinks he can also support longer titles on a list view. | |
It’s often difficult to disentangle whether something is purely labour, purely machinery rental, or a combination of both. Do we need to be able to answer this or is it sufficient to allow the user to select one or both? | Different ways to document combinations of labour and machinery rental:
|
|
Is there a way to make “Services” more useful of a category? Examples from the data include:
|
...