Page Comparison

What migrations - caused by changing existing expense types - need to take place?

Lite Farm

Does it make sense for custom expense types to be at the end? Should they be elsewhere?

How do we make types both short and crisp and descriptive?

Make the short descriptions searchable such that if someone searches for “lease” it brings up “Land” and “Machinery” since both of those might have the idea of a lease embedded within them.

Is alphabetical sorting the best ordering for expense types?

TBD; we would need a very good reason to move away. If we do move away, it needs to be statically ordered.

With 12 default categories, it feels like we’re right on the edge of tiles being a useful tool. Do we need to rethink the selection process / flow?

Remove or reduce icons role and move to list view rather than tile view.

Loic Sans thinks he can also support longer titles on a list view.

It’s often difficult to disentangle whether something is purely labour, purely machinery rental, or a combination of both. Do we need to be able to answer this or is it sufficient to allow the user to select one or both?

Different ways to document combinations of labour and machinery rental:

1. If a task for on-farm labour and machinery, just a completed task

2. If on-farm labour and rental, create a rental expense and complete a task to capture both sides

3. If labour and rental are together, just create 1 or 2 expenses per user preference

4. If you have the equipment but need labour, add worker without account with wage and complete the task

27 Sep 2023

Is there a way to make “Services” more useful of a category? Examples from the data include:

• Logo/ Branding

• Well services

• Soil test

• Seed innoculation