Page Comparison

Requirement specific constraints

New UI elements as described by the Jira ticket:

1. “Tell us about the specific varietal or cultivar you intend to grow” label

2. Crop type name and scientific name labels

3. Left aligned image upload

4. Varietal label and input field

5. Cultivar label and input field

6. Link and label: “+ Customize image for varietal or cultivar”

Additional properties in POST request:

• Varietal

• Cultivar

New properties persisted in the database on flow completion

Role based constraints

FW cannot access add new varietal view via UI, or directly via URL

Ensure only FO/FM/EO can successfully post to this end point

N/A

Does role determine what a user can see or do? Is this enforced uniformly across the front end and back end?

User preferences constraints

All copy is in users preferred language

Is this impacted by user or farm preferences such as language, system of measure, certification status?

Farm-level defaults / preferences

Numerical input constraints

Do we appropriately handle negative, very small, very large, or 0 as inputs?

Text input constraints

• Cultivar is alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

• Varietal is alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

• Varietal is alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

• Cultivar is alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

Do we appropriately handle blank, very small, and very large inputs? Is there a strict format (such as email) that must be followed?

Date based constraints

Are there logical restrictions on what dates can be input? Should a use be able to complete something in the future for example.

Date based assumptions

Are we making valid assumptions about what dates should be allowed?

Timezone driven interactions

If timezones play a role in the data, are they being displayed or converted appropriately?

Interaction / transitioning UI based constraints

• Validation error below varietal if input isn’t alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

• Validation error below cultivar if input isn’t alpha-numeric inputs between 0 and 200 characters in length

• Clicking “+ Customize image for varietal or cultivar” opens the device camera or file uploader

• Clicking help text next to “+ Customize image for varietal or cultivar” opens the help text

• When placing a cursor into a field with microcopy, the microcopy should disappear and reappear when focus is off the field

• When all required fields (Common name, Annual / Perennial) are populated, enable the “Save” button and disable it if fields are cleared

• “Learn more about varietals here” clicking “here” links to cultivar and varietals writeup on the website

• Clicking “Save“ saves all fields including new fields in the store and if seeking certification transitions to the compliance info view. If not seeking certification persists

Is the UI transitioning appropriately? Is the API providing da

Flow based constraints

• Clicking “<“ from compliance info step transitions the user back to the varietal creation view, retrieves previous inputs from the store and populates fields

• Clicking “<“ saves all fields including new fields in the store and transitions the user back to the new crop view. Consequently clicking Continue on the crop view transitions the user back to the varietal creation view, retrieves previous inputs from the store and populates fields

• Retest in new crop creation flow

Is state being preserved appropriately in a flow? If I go back and then forth, is it maintained? Is state invalidated when it should be?

Synchronous / asynchronous constraints

Is the interaction synchronous, asynchronous, or does it support both? Can you simulate both if so?

Time-out / low bandwidth constrains

Does the feature fail gracefully under no bandwidth / low bandwidth environments?

Data transformation correctness

Are values appropriately updated when units change? Is it WYSIWYG?

Outcome correctness

A custom image is displayed for a new varietal when one is supplied during varietal creation

When inputting known inputs with expected outputs - do you get the results you expect? Have you tested several “cases” of this?

Switching farms

Does this feature respond well to switching farms (and returning)?

Notification constraints

Should a notification be marshalled based on this action?

Cascading effects

• You can still create a varietal without new fields

• Can 2 varieties with the same varietal and cultivar exist on the same farm and across farm

• You can still create a varietal without new fields

• Can 2 varieties with the same varietal and cultivar exist on the same farm and across farms

Are there logical places

Integration constrains

Do we need to ensure state is consistent between LiteFarm and the external service? What failure cases do we need to handle? How do we report back the outcome to the user or external service?